Issue 17756

Flag backbone usages that should be a recombination

17756
Reporter: mdoering
Assignee: mdoering
Type: NewFeature
Summary: Flag backbone usages that should be a recombination
Priority: Major
Resolution: Fixed
Status: Resolved
Created: 2015-08-10 11:24:24.948
Updated: 2016-02-04 12:58:32.809
Resolved: 2015-10-12 12:07:12.948
        
Description: See Rods gist: http://gist.neo4j.org/?dae6d15551eda2d7ca12

Because you can only move a species to a genus that has been named, it follows that if a species is described before the genus name was published, then if the species is in that newer genus the authorship must be in parentheses. For example, the lepidopteran genus Heliopyrgus was published in 1957, and includes the species willi Plötz, 1884. Since this species was described before 1957, it must have been originally placed in a different genus, and so the species name should be Heliopyrgus willi (Plötz, 1884). However, GBIF has this as Heliopyrgus willi Plötz, 1884 (no parentheses).


Add some post build checks to the nub generator that flags those usages and adds a new NameUsageIssue.DOUBTFUL_ORIGINAL_NAME]]>
    


Author: mdoering@gbif.org
Created: 2015-09-18 20:39:30.406
Updated: 2015-09-18 20:39:30.406
        
Good example:
http://www.gbif.org/species/search?q=Heliopyrgus+domicella

as recombination in ION: http://www.organismnames.com/details.htm?lsid=1515439
    


Author: mdoering@gbif.org
Created: 2015-10-12 12:07:12.998
Updated: 2015-10-12 12:07:12.998
        
https://github.com/gbif/checklistbank/commit/19fe4783ac6015ea8b8b831b88e1ed002bbf666f

test: https://github.com/gbif/checklistbank/commit/a546ff77857678d0a9dc926292241d334dc4cd87
    


Author: mdoering@gbif.org
Created: 2016-02-02 20:40:03.967
Updated: 2016-02-02 20:40:03.967
        
[~rdmpage] the latest new backbone flags 5110 names being published earlier than their genus:
http://www.gbif-uat.org/species/search?dataset_key=d7dddbf4-2cf0-4f39-9b2a-bb099caae36c&issue=PUBLISHED_BEFORE_GENUS

Thanks for the idea!

    


Author: rdmpage
Comment: [~mdoering@gbif.org] You're welcome! Any plans to display taxon issues in species pages (in the same way that occurrences have issue flags displayed). Would single to user that GBIF "knows" that there is a problem.
Created: 2016-02-03 11:44:17.468
Updated: 2016-02-03 11:44:17.468


Author: mdoering@gbif.org
Created: 2016-02-04 12:58:32.809
Updated: 2016-02-04 12:58:32.809
        
Good idea Rod, no idea why we did not show those before.
I've added them to the bottom of the species page for now:
https://github.com/gbif/portal-web/commit/45841e702c4e3a1f66c4b8fa08782dca0fb7aac0