Issue 14017

Dataset duplication: MICROBIS served through two different publishers

14017
Reporter: ahahn
Assignee: jlegind
Type: Task
Summary: Dataset duplication: MICROBIS served through two different publishers
Description: The MICROBIS dataset served through OBIS (839e3958-f762-11e1-a439-00145eb45e9a) needs to be marked as a duplicate of the one from the Marine Biological Laboratory (840ebec6-f762-11e1-a439-00145eb45e9a), and removed from the index.
Priority: Major
Resolution: Fixed
Status: Closed
Created: 2013-09-20 12:35:05.21
Updated: 2014-01-09 13:21:20.432
Resolved: 2014-01-09 13:21:20.407
        
    


Author: ahahn@gbif.org
Comment: This needs to be checked after registry migration, both on the registry an index/portal side.
Created: 2013-09-26 13:56:51.387
Updated: 2013-09-26 13:56:51.387


Author: ahahn@gbif.org
Comment: Will require the registry to be edited so that the key of the OBIS version of the dataset is inserted into dataset.duplicate_of_dataset_key of MBL one, so that indexers can ignore it as a duplicate
Created: 2013-12-13 14:02:40.225
Updated: 2013-12-13 14:02:40.225


Author: kbraak@gbif.org
Created: 2014-01-08 16:28:57.981
Updated: 2014-01-08 16:28:57.981
        
Using the Registry Console, I have just set OBIS's dataset.duplicate_of_dataset_key = MBL


    


Author: kbraak@gbif.org
Comment: [~omeyn@gbif.org] and [~jlegind@gbif.org] question for you: can I expect the occurrence records of the duplicate dataset to be removed automatically now? 
Created: 2014-01-08 16:30:29.82
Updated: 2014-01-08 16:30:29.82


Author: omeyn@gbif.org
Comment: There are no automatic deletions. This will need to be done explicitly - please coordinate with [~jlegind@gbif.org]
Created: 2014-01-08 16:39:54.482
Updated: 2014-01-08 16:39:54.482


Author: jlegind@gbif.org
Comment: Occurrence records from duplicate dataset 839e3958-f762-11e1-a439-00145eb45e9a were deleted.
Created: 2014-01-09 13:21:20.429
Updated: 2014-01-09 13:21:20.429