Species interpretation issue - Fungi species taxon-match-none

18263
Reporter: jlegind
Assignee: mblissett
Type: Bug
Summary: Species interpretation issue - Fungi species taxon-match-none
Priority: Major
Resolution: Fixed
Status: Closed
Created: 2016-02-25 12:39:47.06
Updated: 2016-02-26 11:55:32.076
Resolved: 2016-02-26 11:55:31.978
        
Description: {quote}Dear Sir or Madam,
I would like to report a problem with datasets sent to GBIF. These are from the
Muséum d'Histoire Naturelle de Bourges (France / http://www.gbif.org/publisher/32b45fb7-1992-4f30-95c8-1604a38a57fa).

I'm surprised to see that published data are totally different from the original sent to GBIF. For example, I'm the author of the dataset called "
Collection botanique Letendre (abbé) (BOUM)", and I can ensure that all names of species were fully completed (genus, species, author and date), but all appear as "Unknow species" in GBIF ! ; see : http://www.gbif.org/occurrence/search?datasetKey=c424b110-bc4d-43aa-980e-66cc853e6293&HAS_COORDINATE=true&HAS_GEOSPATIAL_ISSUE=false.

I also observed that a lot of original names of species were modified erroneously.

Please, could you tell me what happens with our data shared with GBIF ?
Yours sincerely,
Franck MADDI{quote}

http://www.gbif.org/occurrence/1234808946/verbatim
Scientific name (Diploschistes actinostomus) resolves while the supplied kingdom rank name does not (Fungi, Bartling, 1830).

Markus Döring: we “just” need to reprocess all data in prod at some stage]]>
    

Author: mblissett
Created: 2016-02-25 13:27:36.423
Updated: 2016-02-25 13:27:36.423
        
Since this has lots of occurrences in France I'll deploy my fixed occurrence-cli and recrawl it. (France crosses 0° so shouldn't be reinterpreted before that).

    

Author: mdoering@gbif.org
Created: 2016-02-25 14:20:38.648
Updated: 2016-02-25 14:20:38.648
        
Assigning to Matt as the nub lookup is fixed and deployed:
http://api.gbif.org/v1/species/match?name=Diploschistes%20actinostomus&kingdom=Fungi%2C%20Bartling%2C%201830&phylum=Ascomycota%2C%20Caval.-Sm.%2C%201998&class=Lecanoromycetes%2C%20O.E.%20Erikss.%20%26%20Winka%2C%201997&order=Ostropales%2C%20Nannf.%2C%201932&family=Graphidaceae%2C%20Dumort.%2C%201822&genus=Diploschistes&verbose=true
    

Author: mblissett
Created: 2016-02-26 11:55:32.006
Updated: 2016-02-26 11:55:32.006
        
I reinterpreted all the occurrences from this publisher, which should have solved this.

There are a few recently published names in the example dataset, which will resolve to higher taxa until the name is present in the GBIF backbone.