18710
Reporter: kylecopas
Type: Feedback
Summary: DOI only displayed as an alternate identifier?
Resolution: Fixed
Status: Closed
Created: 2016-08-30 11:17:49.633
Updated: 2016-08-30 16:23:55.139
Resolved: 2016-08-30 16:23:55.104
Description: I feel like I've seen this a couple of times lately, but note the absence of the blue DOI button above the publisher logo here.
Can't pull up other examples (yet), but I want to ask if this is a bug or something about the dataset registration? ]]>
Author: kylecopas
Created: 2016-08-30 11:36:48.275
Updated: 2016-08-30 11:36:48.275
Found another: is it logo size/placement, perhaps?
http://www.gbif.org/dataset/379156c8-c268-4537-aea4-83d94cc785f5
Author: cgendreau
Created: 2016-08-30 14:00:37.846
Updated: 2016-08-30 14:00:37.846
yes, there is a real issue with DOI on a selected number of datasets.
Working on it with [~kbraak@gbif.org]
Author: cgendreau
Created: 2016-08-30 15:56:49.761
Updated: 2016-08-30 15:56:49.761
Fixed code to not replace DOI on metadata reinterpretation unless a DOI is provided.
https://github.com/gbif/registry/commit/e0df1b589f23592a846c3aec656871a868bc2dab
Author: kbraak@gbif.org
Created: 2016-08-30 16:23:55.136
Updated: 2016-08-30 16:23:55.136
Regrettably some dataset's DOI were removed on Friday while running an update script. The update script was also responsible for adding the DOI as an alternate identifier.
I have now restored the missing DOIs from a backup of the registry and deleted the extra alternate identifiers that were created.
I can confirm that following the restoration work all non-deleted datasets now have a DOI.
Closing issue.