Issue 19118

basis of record invalid!?

Reporter: feedback bot
Assignee: ahahn
Type: Feedback
Summary: basis of record invalid!?
Status: Open
Created: 2017-08-17 11:11:13.4
Updated: 2017-10-10 11:46:23.325
Description: Ich habe 2 Fragen:

1. Warum ist die Basis des Dadatnsatzes invalid?
2. Ich habe ein höreres Taxon gewählt um eine Liste aller gefunden Arten aus Deuschtland zu bekommen. Ist das anders möglich?

*Reporter*: Dorothee Sandmann
*E-mail*: []]]>

Author: rdmpage
Created: 2017-08-17 13:21:53.83
Updated: 2017-08-17 13:21:53.83
I have 2 questions:
1. Why is the basis of the dadat set invalid?
2. I chose a -hearing- (higher?) taxon to get a list of all the species from Deuschtland. Is it otherwise possible?

Author: cgendreau
Created: 2017-08-17 13:28:00.075
Updated: 2017-08-17 13:28:00.075
I can answer question 1:
BasicOfRecord is not provided in the original archive.
[] would it be possible to contact the data publisher?

Created: 2017-08-17 13:37:36.65
Updated: 2017-08-17 13:37:36.65
Question 2: get a list of all species from Germany:
- start from
- set Country filter to "Germany"
- switch to the "species" tab at the top of the result list

I'll contact the publisher about the basis of record issue

Comment: From the metadata description of the publishing database,, this is a mixed dataset collating data from literature and museum collections. Since Literature is not an accepted vocabulary term for the basisOfRecord, this somewhat falls into a gap (also see Publisher contacted.
Created: 2017-10-06 11:17:46.626
Updated: 2017-10-06 11:17:46.626

Comment: Response received (email on helpdesk@); work in progress. Values of "collections", "literature" and "research raw data" exist in the database, proposed mapping to controlled vocabulary values and adding to BasisOfRecord.
Created: 2017-10-10 11:46:23.325
Updated: 2017-10-10 11:46:23.325