As a dataset owner I want to see the full attribution for my dataset(s) so that I can be properly cited.
10035
Reporter: omeyn
Type: Feedback
Summary: As a dataset owner I want to see the full attribution for my dataset(s) so that I can be properly cited.
Priority: Major
Resolution: Fixed
Status: Closed
Created: 2011-10-27 11:47:37.034
Updated: 2013-09-26 22:56:31.973
Resolved: 2013-09-26 22:56:31.942
Description: The following information should be visible:
- provided by
- hosted by
- endorsed by
see /dataset/id page]]>
Author: kbraak@gbif.org
Created: 2012-01-17 15:34:32.326
Updated: 2012-01-17 15:34:32.326
All three of these are now visible in the right sidebar of the dataset page.
Question: if provided by and hosted by are the same organization, do we show:
1) both "provided by X" and "hosted by X", 2) only "provided by X", or 3) "provided by and hosted by X"
Currently, dataset page uses 1).
Author: ahahn@gbif.org
Comment: I would propose to only show 2) "provided by X" if host and publisher are identical, but rename it to "published by" to stick with current conventions.
Created: 2012-01-23 12:04:04.152
Updated: 2012-01-23 12:04:04.152
Author: ahahn@gbif.org
Comment: Please be aware that POR-16 is a user story (_not_ a task), and will not be closed with the editing of the publisher/host/endorsed texts alone: it also encloses other things like citation texts on pages and downloads. Please rather consider to create concrete issues for implementation details under a story.
Created: 2012-01-23 12:11:47.866
Updated: 2012-01-23 12:11:47.866
Author: kbraak@gbif.org
Created: 2012-01-23 12:21:39.986
Updated: 2012-01-23 12:21:39.986
So to be clear, you propose to replace "provided by" altogether with "published by" - sounds good.
Thanks
Author: kbraak@gbif.org
Comment: Issue resolved. Please see http://staging.gbif.org:8080/portal-web-dynamic/dataset/a6ff352b-cffe-441b-9b82-832f5d8716b6 for an example.
Created: 2012-01-23 13:44:42.669
Updated: 2012-01-23 13:44:42.669
Author: kbraak@gbif.org
Comment: More to do - opening issue again
Created: 2012-01-23 14:14:23.053
Updated: 2012-01-23 14:14:23.053
Author: kbraak@gbif.org
Comment: I don't think we knew this was a user story at the time of assigning this issue to this sprint. It's scope of work is quite broad. [~mdoering@gbif.org] Can we deal with individual blockers in subsequent sprints please?
Created: 2012-11-02 17:12:52.528
Updated: 2012-11-02 17:12:52.528
Author: mdoering@gbif.org
Comment: Ideally at least everything concerning the dataset page should be done in this sprint. But breaking apart the story into smaller issues for sure is good in any case. For example the citation within downloads should be separate issues (in the respective projects) that can be dealt with later (next sprint was supposed to be about downloads). If everything else is done lets close this story. What about POR-173?
Created: 2012-11-02 18:10:24.07
Updated: 2012-11-02 18:10:24.07