Nomenclatoral status missing on usage/species pages

10155
Reporter: omeyn
Assignee: mdoering
Type: SubTask
Summary: Nomenclatoral status missing on usage/species pages
Priority: Major
Resolution: Fixed
Status: Closed
Created: 2011-11-07 16:58:06.857
Updated: 2013-08-29 14:46:11.12
Resolved: 2011-12-12 12:49:54.628

Author: ahahn@gbif.org
Created: 2011-11-15 17:13:57.768
Updated: 2011-11-15 17:13:57.768
        
Need to define the level:
- accepted / synonym are displayed under the Status header in the Overview block and the Synonyms header of the Taxonomy block
- rejected names, junior synonyms etc. (http://www.ipni.org/nom_status.html; http://www.aa3sd.net/IPNI2/index.php?title=Comments_on_taxonomicStatus_and_nomenclatural_Status_vocabularies): if available in standardised form (nom. inval., nom. illeg.), suggest to append them to the full name in the Overview box without a separated header ("Genus species (author) authorteam, nom. illeg.")

Are there some examples from available data sources?
    

Author: mdoering@gbif.org
Created: 2011-12-01 23:07:48.567
Updated: 2011-12-01 23:07:48.567
        
here are some example usages with a nom status given:

http://ecat-dev.gbif.org/usage/100026447
http://ecat-dev.gbif.org/usage/100470879
http://ecat-dev.gbif.org/usage/100471431

I tend to put this into the overview somewhere. Maybe simply add it to the "Status"? Then we simply have taxonomic and nomenclatural status there
    

Author: mdoering@gbif.org
Comment: Adding a new overview entry for now. To be reviewed again
Created: 2011-12-12 12:20:55.2
Updated: 2011-12-12 12:20:55.2