Issue 13917

Bad name of organization (ECAT Development Publisher)

Reporter: trobertson
Assignee: ahahn
Type: Feedback
Summary: Bad name of organization (ECAT Development Publisher)
Priority: Critical
Resolution: Fixed
Status: Closed
Created: 2013-09-16 10:50:09.556
Updated: 2013-09-28 12:50:14.651
Resolved: 2013-09-28 12:50:14.618
Description: Can we please find a suitable name for Ecat Development Publisher which shows up on:

Perhaps we can use the GBIF Secretatiat organization or similar?

*Reporter*: Tim
*E-mail*: [mailto:trobertson]]]>

Created: 2013-09-16 10:53:21.332
Updated: 2013-09-16 10:53:21.332

Is this something that should be visible?  Perhaps we can discuss a name change, or doing something "creatively acceptable" (e.g. using a "GBIF Secretariat" and some sensible description describing why it exists).  Similar to the Catalogue of Life

Comment: In GBRDS, the former "ECAT development publisher" is now renamed to "GBIF Secretariat", with a description that reads "The GBIF Secretariat, while not a publisher itself, takes the role of data host for some data resources on names that are critical for central operations." ( Would that be acceptable, []?
Created: 2013-09-26 17:09:39.639
Updated: 2013-09-26 17:09:39.639