Rethink the display of "issues" on occurrence records

16134
Reporter: trobertson
Type: Improvement
Summary: Rethink the display of "issues" on occurrence records
Priority: Critical
Resolution: Fixed
Status: Closed
Created: 2014-07-20 05:43:23.43
Updated: 2017-10-10 09:33:58.608
Resolved: 2017-10-10 09:33:58.58
        
        
Description: publishers (e.g. INBO) are questioning why things are flagged as issues.

We should rethink saying some are issues, as some are just advisor notices - e.g. countries was inferred, coords are rounded.

This should also link to a page documenting how we interpret content.]]>
    

Author: mdoering@gbif.org
Comment: The processing page exists in Drupal since about a month, but it is still awaiting Tim Hirschs official approvement so it is not yet public. Not all issues are listed in details there yet, but it explains in some details how all the interpretation is done and how we flag "issues" in general
Created: 2014-07-21 10:32:07.948
Updated: 2014-07-21 10:32:07.948

Author: kbraak@gbif.org
Comment: [~kylecopas] what is the status on the processing page? 
Created: 2014-07-29 11:41:44.455
Updated: 2014-07-29 11:41:44.455

Author: kylecopas
Comment: Sorry, it doesn't ring a bell—not sure that I know anything about this item.
Created: 2014-07-29 11:47:17.247
Updated: 2014-07-29 11:47:17.247