Issue 16535
Check why MISSING_ACCEPTED taxon is created without synonym
16535
Reporter: mdoering
Assignee: mdoering
Type: Bug
Summary: Check why MISSING_ACCEPTED taxon is created without synonym
Priority: Major
Resolution: Fixed
Status: Closed
Created: 2014-10-15 17:59:55.333
Updated: 2015-02-26 23:10:15.312
Resolved: 2015-02-26 23:10:15.284
Description: This genus claims to be artificially created by clb indexing with origin=MISSING_ACCEPTED, but it doesnt have any synonym linked. How does this happen?
http://www.gbif.org/dataset/3e812f13-bd5f-46b6-9bae-710766be526d/stats
http://www.gbif.org/species/search?dataset_key=3e812f13-bd5f-46b6-9bae-710766be526d&issue=ACCEPTED_NAME_MISSING
-----
{
key: 141121242
order: "Blattodea"
genus: "Incertae sedis"
orderKey: 134504357
genusKey: 141121242
datasetKey: "3e812f13-bd5f-46b6-9bae-710766be526d"
parentKey: 134504357
parent: "Blattodea"
scientificName: "Incertae sedis"
authorship: ""
nameType: "BLACKLISTED"
rank: "GENUS"
origin: "MISSING_ACCEPTED"
taxonomicStatus: "DOUBTFUL"
nomenclaturalStatus: [ ]
numDescendants: 0
lastCrawled: "2014-10-15T14:12:36.636+0000"
lastInterpreted: "2014-10-15T14:25:22.062+0000"
issues: [ ]
synonym: false
}
-----]]>
Author: mdoering@gbif.org
Created: 2015-02-26 17:15:19.652
Updated: 2015-02-26 17:15:40.425
Reindexing blattodea with the latest code does not seem to cuase that issue.
We only see 5 taxa with missing accepted name, but they all seem to be valid cases.
For example this nomen nudum Atemeleta Brunner von Wattenwyl, 1893
http://www.gbif.org/species/134509509/verbatim
http://cockroach.speciesfile.org/Common/basic/Taxa.aspx?TaxonNameID=1177727
I am just surprised to not see the dwc:namePublishedIn value:
http://api.gbif.org/v1/species/134509509