Issue 17850
Why are dates flagged as "unlikely"?
17850
Reporter: feedback bot
Assignee: cgendreau
Type: Bug
Summary: Why are dates flagged as "unlikely"?
Priority: Critical
Resolution: Fixed
Status: Resolved
Created: 2015-09-26 00:33:20.988
Updated: 2015-10-14 10:07:11.118
Resolved: 2015-10-14 10:07:11.098
Description: http://www.gbif.org/occurrence/1135213568 (originally from http://www.inaturalist.org/observations/1852563), has a prominent notice warning the viewer that
Modified date unlikely
Identified date unlikely
Why was this so flagged? Is it because they are relatively recent? If that's the expectation, then *all* recent iNaturalist contributions are going to get flagged like this, even though the modified date and identified date are perfectly accurate. That doesn't seem quite fair.
*Reporter*: Ken-ichi Ueda
*E-mail*: [mailto:kueda@inaturalist.org]]]>
Author: mdoering@gbif.org
Created: 2015-09-28 10:59:34.555
Updated: 2015-09-28 10:59:34.555
Looks like this comes from the fact that we use a final date range for valid dates which gets set once at CLI startup:
https://github.com/gbif/occurrence/blob/master/occurrence-processor/src/main/java/org/gbif/occurrence/processor/interpreting/TemporalInterpreter.java#L35
We need to either extend the range or update it daily