As a registry console user, I want easy visual feedback which data are handled in automatic synchronisations, so that I do not do manual edits and then lose them

10740
Reporter: ahahn
Type: Story
Summary: As a registry console user, I want easy visual feedback which data are handled in automatic synchronisations, so that I do not do manual edits and then lose them
Description: relates to business rules for updating metadata. Need to ensure that there is no situation where manual edits collide with automatic updates (field locking, visual feedback / shading, overruling where necessary)
Priority: Major
Status: Open
Created: 2012-02-02 12:21:30.403
Updated: 2015-03-02 14:39:40.628

Author: kbraak@gbif.org
Created: 2013-12-10 12:30:05.427
Updated: 2013-12-10 12:30:05.427
        
Unless the dataset "is locked for auto updating", the Registry Console admin can anticipate that their changes will be overwritten by a metadata update. Of course that excludes advanced fields, such as the owning organization.

[~jlegind@gbif.org] do you think it would be helpful, to have a filter for all datasets that are currently locked for auto updating? If not, and if [~ahahn@gbif.org] doesn't disagree, I'll close this user story.



    

Author: kbraak@gbif.org
Comment:  REG-466 created to add this new filter. Thanks [~ahahn@gbif.org]
Created: 2013-12-10 14:46:33.467
Updated: 2013-12-10 14:58:37.996

Author: jlegind@gbif.org
Comment: I actually think this filter would have its uses. And if it was to be implemented it would save time writing postgres queries.
Created: 2013-12-10 15:22:31.89
Updated: 2013-12-10 15:22:31.89