Decide on use java.util.UUID type parameter instead of Strings when handling UUIDs all throught persistence layer

10913
Reporter: jcuadra
Assignee: jcuadra
Type: Improvement
Summary: Decide on use java.util.UUID type parameter instead of Strings when handling UUIDs all throught persistence layer
Description: service layers are handling java.util.UUID for UUIDs already, so there is an annoying mandatory toString() call if we want to pass the UUID down to the persistence layer. Consider using typed java.util.UUID for all UUID parameters in persistence. Fedes work might be impacted.
Priority: Major
Resolution: Fixed
Status: Closed
Created: 2012-03-01 12:42:25.563
Updated: 2013-12-16 17:50:16.726
Resolved: 2012-03-05 14:47:03.323

Author: jcuadra@gbif.org
Comment: Fede has agreed on this change. I will go ahead and make all the changes needed on the persistence layer. 
Created: 2012-03-02 11:23:58.942
Updated: 2012-03-02 11:23:58.942

Author: jcuadra@gbif.org
Created: 2012-03-05 14:47:03.336
Updated: 2012-03-05 14:47:03.336
        
Persistence layer now uses java.util.UUID-typed UUIDs

changes on
http://code.google.com/p/gbif-registry/source/detail?r=2378